Turkish wolves. Photo by Aykut Ince |
Introduction
"The wolf is the most controversial predator in
Europe, as it occupies conflicting places in people’s imaginations, being
simultaneously loved and hated. On one hand it is held up as symbol of wilderness
and the return of nature, while for others wolves symbolise waste, destruction
and negative changes. As a result wolf conservation is almost always
controversial. Historically wolves have been heavily persecuted in Europe for
millennia, and were exterminated from most of western Europe in the last two
centuries, probably reaching their minimum in the 1940’s to 1960’s. Since then,
many populations have begun to recover and expand their range, for example in
Spain and Italy. Furthermore, in the last twenty years, the species has been
recovering naturally and reappearing in areas from which they had become
extinct, for example in France, northern Italy, Sweden, Norway, Finland,
Germany and Switzerland. However, the present distribution of wolves in Europe
is extremely uneven and densities vary greatly from country to country. This
recovery has revealed their extreme ecological adaptability, enabling them to
survive in extremely diverse environments. Wolves can basically survive
anywhere they can find a source of food, and this can be of various sources, from
wild animals, to livestock, to garbage. The only limiting factor seems to be
the human persecution and presence of adequate sites for reproduction. As a
result the conservation of wolves is less of an ecological issue and becomes a
social issue, strictly linked to the diverse cultural and socio-economic
conditions of the areas they inhabit. This makes international legislation
extremely hard to be enforced in highly diverse European countries. This is a
particularly sensitive issue when it comes to the conservation and management
of wolf populations that are transboundary in nature, occupying territories
belonging to different countries, and thus requiring international
collaboration. The situation is made even more difficult by the lack of scientifically
sound data standardised across different countries. This report is an attempt
to provide an updated snapshot of the current conservation status of the wolf
in the European countries where its presence has been recorded and that have
ratified the Bern Convention."
Current wolf distribution in Europe, indicated by the black areas. |
International
legislation for conservation of wolves in Europe
"At the international level wolves are included
in several conservation agreements. The 1996 Red List of the IUCN – World
Conservation Union classifies the wolf as vulnerable. The IUCN has also approved
a Manifesto of Wolf Conservation, initially drafted in 1973 and later revised
to incorporate the changes in wolf status, public attitudes and management
techniques.
CITES (Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of the Wild Fauna and Flora (3.3.1973)) lists the wolf in
Appendix II (potentially endangered species), with the exception of Bhutan, Pakistan, India and Nepal where it is
listed in Appendix I (species in danger of extinction). The EC Habitats
Directive (92/43 of 21.5.1992) (European Union members only) also lists the
wolf in Appendix II (needs habitat conservation) with the exception of the
populations in Spain north of the river Duero, the populations in Greece north
of 39° longitude and the populations in Finland. The wolf is also listed in
Appendix IV (fully protected) with the exception of the populations in Spain
north of the river Duero, the populations in Greece north of 39° longitude and
the populations in Finland in the semi-domestic reindeer husbandry areas where
wolves are listed in Annex V.
The European Parliament has approved
(24.1.1989) a resolution (Doc. A2-0377/88, Ser.A) which calls for immediate
steps in favour of wolf conservation in all European States, adopts the IUCN
Wolf Manifesto and invites the European
Commission to expand and provide financial means to support wolf conservation."
The Bern Convention and
wolf in Europe
"Wolves are also included in Appendix II
(strictly protected species) of the Bern Convention (Convention on the
Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats, 19.9.1979). The wolf
and its habitat receive full protection from the convention, although
enforcement relies on the Contracting Parties which may not fully apply their
obligations. Moreover, individual parties may make reservations and wolves will
not be protected by them: of the countries that have signed the Convention,
Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia,
Slovakia, Spain and Turkey have made an exception for wolf protection (see
table below). The Standing Committee of the Bern Convention adopted an article
of recommendation on the protection of the wolf in Europe (Rec. No. 17/1989)."
List of declarations
and exceptions made with respect to the Convention on the Conservation of
European Wildlife and Natural Habitats Current status of wolf in European Bern
Convention
Spain: “Reservations concerning the list of
species set out in Appendix II. The under mentioned species are excluded from
this list as far as Spain is concerned: Canis lupus (…). A reservation is made
concerning the fauna species Canis lupus (...), included in Appendix II as
"Strictly protected fauna species", which will be considered by Spain
as "Protected fauna species" enjoying the régime of protection
provided for by the Convention for the species included in Appendix III.”
Current status of wolf
in European Bern Convention Countries
"Given the diversity of situations highlighted
in the previous sections, together with the uneven distribution of wolf throughout
Europe, an assessment of its conservation status was performed in those
European countries were it is currently present. The current status of wolf was
assessed in those countries that are both geographically included in Europe (W
of 35°E) and are contracting parties of the Bern Convention. A questionnaire
was sent to experts in each of the country with a request for information and a
map of the current distribution of wolf in their home country. The information
collected include: the estimated population size and trend, the geographical
distribution, the legal status and potential threats. The information is
presented below on a country by country basis. The quality of data varies
dramatically between countries. In some areas such as Norway, Sweden, Finland,
and the alpine populations of France and Italy data is based on standardised
snowtracking/radio-tracking and the use of DNA-based methods. In others, such
as Estonia. Latvia, Poland, Spain and Portugal there are organised surveys of
pack distribution and presence. However, in many other countries, numbers are
based on “official” estimates from the forestry or hunting districts (these
methods are widely believed to overestimate population size due to double
counting) or on expert assessment."
Countries
Albania. Bulgaria. Croatia. Czech Republic. Estonia.
Finland. France. Germany. Greece. Hungary. Italy. Latvia. Lithuania. Former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Norway. Poland. Portugal. Romania. Slovakia. Slovenia.
Spain. Sweden. Switzerland. Turkey. Ukraine.
The distribution range of wolf in Spain. |
"Population Status: The Spanish wolf population counts
more than 2,000 animals, concentrated mainly in the North-western part of the
country. The population is shared with Portugal, thus it is called the Iberian
wolf population. The population trend is increasing.
Distribution: The distribution range of the
Spanish part of the Iberian wolf population includes different portions of the
following regions: Castilla-Léon, Asturias, Galicia, Cantabria, La Rioja and
Castilla La Mancha. The region South of the river Duero was recently
re-colonised by the species. A small isolated population is found in Andalucia
(Sierra Morena).
Legal and Conservation
Status: In the
regions North of Duero river the wolf is a game species except in Galicia, where
it is partially protected. Hunting quotas are established yearly, under the
responsibility of the Autonomous Region’s Governments. South of the Duero river,
the species is protected under the requirements of E.C. Habitat Directive
92/43, although permits for controlling “problem” animals that prey on
livestock are issued regularly every year. In Andalucìa no hunting or control
is permitted. A system for compensating damage caused by wolf has been set up
in 2003.
Potential Threats: The Northern portion of Spanish
wolf population may be threatened by negative attitudes of local farmers
suffering damage, by habitat fragmentation (by newly projected transport infrastructures)
and the decrease of artificial food resources represented by garbage and
carrion now being destroyed due to mad cow disease. The Southern population is
certainly threatened by human intolerance and illegal killing."
Conclusions
"A number of conclusions can be drawn from this
report.
(1) The quality of data available on wolf
numbers and distributions varies widely throughout Europe, from those where
each individual is identified to others where expert assessment is the only
available way to approximate wolf status. Reducing this gap in data quality
should be addressed. This is especially important because it is often the
countries with most wolves that have the worst data.
(2) Wolf populations seem to be generally
stable or increasing throughout most, but not all the Bern Convention
countries.
(3) Human acceptance of wolves appears to be a
major problem in many areas, especially in areas where wolves have returned
after an absence. This lack of acceptance is linked to many different conflicts,
including livestock depredation, competition with hunters, predation on
domestic dogs, fear and wider social conflicts for which wolves become symbols.
It is important to not underestimate these conflicts, or to believe that they
are only linked to livestock. Understanding the reasons why acceptance varies
so much between countries could be important for finding solutions.
(4) Human mortality, either through hunter
harvest, official lethal control, or poaching seems to be the main limiting
factor for wolf populations. There are several countries where wolf management
is clearly unsustainable due to over-harvest, and even state sanctioned bounty
programs. On the other hand, properly regulated wolf harvest appears to be
compatible with wolf conservation in many countries. In many cases it may be a
prerequisite for public acceptance by allowing countries to keep wolf populations
at a level which is socially acceptable. Countries have used many different
legal mechanisms to maintain management flexibility with respect to being able
to kill wolves, either using exceptions, derogations or various interpretations
of convention definitions.
(5) Poaching is a widespread problem in many
countries with very diverse socio-economic backgrounds. There is a clear need
for effective education and enforcement throughout wolf range. The lack of
control over poaching greatly reduces management flexibility through legal
means because of the need to account for this uncertainty.
Report on the conservation status and threats
for wolf (Canis lupus) in Europe: Valeria
Salvatori & John Linnell (2005) Council of Europe, Large Carnivore Initiative
for Europe (LCIE) (October 2005) http://bit.ly/SCNfJY (descargar y abrir con un lector de PDF) (Publicado por: http://www.wwf.se/
)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario